Is This Token a SCAM

Evaluating SCAM safety and audit status

Evaluating whether a specific asset is legitimate requires looking past the name into the actual contract parameters and on-chain data. For the Solana asset under question, the live price sits at $0.000201 with a 24-hour gain of +4.42%. Market capitalization is measured at $201.0K, backed by $41.9K in liquidity and $21.1K in daily trading volume. A total of 8,523 holders currently hold positions in the token, which was deployed using https://j7tracker.io and listed around 2026-04-27. The official site is https://github.com/tinyhumansai, and the community gathers at twitter: 2048799712375902624.

That distribution reflects an active asset.

On-chain verification and contract parameters

Technical security checks reveal important parameters enforced directly by the Solana program code. The mint authority is disabled, meaning no new supply can be created, and the freeze authority is similarly disabled so balances cannot be frozen by any party. Total supply matches the circulating supply at exactly 999,832,283 tokens with 6 decimals. Top holders control 21.0% of the total supply, and the project holds a medium organic-activity rating while remaining verified on Jupiter.

Mint and freeze controls are fully renounced.

Verixia Safety Read and risk scoring

Verixia assigns this asset a Safety Read grade of B with a score of 79 out of 100, placing it in a low risk category. The underlying verdict notes that mint and freeze are renounced, though liquidity remains thin. Verified receipts show revoked mint permissions, no freeze capability, a top-ten concentration of 21.0%, an organic score of 50 out of 100, and Jupiter verification alongside the $41.9K liquidity pool and 8,523 holders. Certain items like dev wallet distributions and launch bundling remain unverified from public data.

A clean audit grade is never a blanket assurance of future price performance.

Liquidity distribution across trading venues

Execution depth varies significantly depending on which pool handles the swap routing. The deepest liquidity sits on PumpSwap for the SCAM/SOL pair at $76.8K, followed by Meteora pools holding $4.0K and $351 respectively, alongside a Meteora Dynamic V2 pool for SCAM/ANSEM at $75, plus 15 smaller secondary pools. That fragmentation means traders executing larger sizes should expect noticeable price impact unless routing protocols aggregate multiple venues efficiently.

PumpSwap holds the primary depth.

Price action and 24-hour trade flow

Recent momentum reflects a balanced tug-of-war between buyers and sellers across multiple timeframes. The last 24 hours recorded 141 buys against 172 sells, meaning 45% of total executed trades were buy orders. Price action demonstrated consistent upward movement, gaining +0.41% over the past 1-hour window, +4.02% across 6 hours, and +4.01% over the full 24-hour span.

Buy and sell pressure remain tightly contested.

Comparative standing against established Solana tokens

Placing these metrics side-by-side with larger ecosystem assets clarifies scale and market positioning. Bonk trades at $0.000003063 with a +4.77% 24-hour change, a $269.6M market cap, $0.82M in liquidity, and 1,006,790 holders, while JUP changes hands at $0.1871 with a +4.14% 24-hour move, $621.3M market cap, $2.73M in liquidity, and 837,196 holders. By comparison, SCAM operates at a much smaller micro-cap tier with significantly lower liquidity depth and fewer participants.

Scale differences explain the execution variance.

Finding and trading the token securely

Executing a swap for this asset requires pointing your non-custodial wallet to the correct contract address to avoid interacting with mimic tokens or fraudulent clones. The exact mint address on Solana is 6AVAUKa9uxQpruHZUinFECpXEh1usRVtzQWK8N2wpump, which must be verified before confirming any transaction. You can trade it directly alongside other trending assets by checking the Memes tab or scanning live signals.

Double-check that mint hash every single time.